Hi all, First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive. A few thank you’s: - Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote experience.
- Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference.
- Austin Pinto and other recording engineers.
- Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support.
- NV Access crew: another amazing keynote.
- Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for you. Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively. Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available. I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance. May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come. Cheers, Joseph Joseph S. Lee Student (communication studies), California State University, Los Angeles Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project Certified NVDA Expert, 2019 Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
|
|
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom
for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more
control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple
of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the
recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at
NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event
despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues
in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the
post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
- Robert
Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the
pre-keynote experience.
- Laura
Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming
parts of the conference.
- Austin Pinto
and other recording engineers.
- Derek
Riemer: infrastructure and providing support.
- NV Access
crew: another amazing keynote.
- Presenters:
for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who
shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless
encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for
you.
Second, based on actual experience and
post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers
look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of
course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but
mostly to help future conference moderators perform their
tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee
apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential
platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform
is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to
familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still
alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings
become available.
I announced this after the closing forum,
but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in
NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to,
I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go
over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to
comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from
that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the
community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California
State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA
screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers
Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
|
|
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom
for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more
control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple
of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the
recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at
NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event
despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues
in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the
post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
- Robert
Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the
pre-keynote experience.
- Laura
Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming
parts of the conference.
- Austin Pinto
and other recording engineers.
- Derek
Riemer: infrastructure and providing support.
- NV Access
crew: another amazing keynote.
- Presenters:
for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who
shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless
encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for
you.
Second, based on actual experience and
post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers
look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of
course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but
mostly to help future conference moderators perform their
tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee
apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential
platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform
is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to
familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still
alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings
become available.
I announced this after the closing forum,
but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in
NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to,
I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go
over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to
comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from
that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the
community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California
State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA
screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers
Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
|
|
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and
individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some
promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA
community worldwide starts something like this now that would be
great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said
orgs for the blind on board that would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it
actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon
- so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal
to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how
that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for
Zoom for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts
have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for
the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well
and hope to hear the recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many
people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a
successful event despite the pandemic and its effects.
Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran
smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very
extensive.
A few thank you’s:
- Robert Hangi: chairing the
organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote
experience.
- Laura Cornwell and
friends: effective promotion, and for streaming
parts of the conference.
- Austin Pinto and other
recording engineers.
- Derek Riemer:
infrastructure and providing support.
- NV Access crew: another
amazing keynote.
- Presenters: for
diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience
members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving
organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event
served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience
and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that
organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon
2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about
accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future
conference moderators perform their tasks more
efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee
apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with
potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that
when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly
using that platform to familiarize themselves as to
how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is
still alive. The next post from there will be done
when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing
forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be
participating in NVDACon planning for next year.
However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for
presenters upon request – mostly to go over online
presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments,
and refining small things in content. Apart from that,
I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge
the community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies),
California State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons
reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and
Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
|
|
Hi Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom: https://zoom.us/pricingI'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost. I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will gladly pay it from my own pocket". This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so on) amounts to $1200 per year. Some people said that we could use their accounts. I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be dependant on others. Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities. Cheers Robert
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote: Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@... <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote experience. * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference. * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers. * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support. * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote. * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
|
|
Hi all, I hope you all are doing well.
I wanted to drop in and leave a few lines here on this topic. If we were doing something more consistent; such as having a seminar once a month or something, I could see spending$1,200. As it is now, our conference is only once a year. Why would we spend that money when it could be used for other things?
There are other options for hosting the conference. As Robert said. There is a list being compiled. When it is complete. The committee will take a serious look at it and go from there.
It is our wish to present this in a way that everyone can experience it. We want to make sure that it is accessible and can host the number of people that attend the conference.
I’m sure more info will be dropped next year. So please be patient.
Ashley C
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Dec 7, 2020, at 7:48 PM, Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...> wrote: Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom: https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost. I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will gladly pay it from my own pocket". This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts. I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be dependant on others. Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and
individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@... <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote experience. * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference. * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers. * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support. * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote. * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
|
|
Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from running the show next year!
In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about sponsorship is worthwhile.
For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to hearing the recordings!
Quentin.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom:
https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost.
I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will
gladly pay it from my own pocket".
This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year
The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live
streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so
on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts.
I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be
dependant on others.
Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph
said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers
Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
> Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and
> individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion
> etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide
> starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many
> folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that
> would be a running start.
>
> On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
>> I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up
>> being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a
>> matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative
>> platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded
>> and/or set up.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@...
>> <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
>>
>> I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for
>> 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control.
>> I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years
>> pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings
>> soon.
>>
>> On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I
>>> personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic
>>> and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran
>>> smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
>>>
>>> A few thank you’s:
>>>
>>> * Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading
>>> the pre-keynote experience.
>>> * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for
>>> streaming parts of the conference.
>>> * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers.
>>> * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support.
>>> * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote.
>>> * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
>>>
>>> And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion
>>> for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the
>>> event served as a healing moment for you.
>>>
>>> Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I
>>> would like to suggest that organizers look into a different
>>> platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think
>>> about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future
>>> conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom
>>> is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel
>>> spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to
>>> suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly
>>> using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it
>>> effectively.
>>>
>>> Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from
>>> there will be done when recordings become available.
>>>
>>> I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm
>>> that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next
>>> year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for
>>> presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation
>>> etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things
>>> in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the
>>> distance.
>>>
>>> May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Joseph
>>>
>>> Joseph S. Lee
>>>
>>> Student (communication studies), California State University, Los
>>> Angeles
>>>
>>> Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
>>>
>>> Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
>>>
>>> Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon –
>>> 2014 to 2016
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager
|
|
Thanks Quentin for the kind words
I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours (like now where it is 2:00 am here). Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance. Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any time again. I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be. Cheers Robert
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote: Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from running the show next year!
In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about sponsorship is worthwhile.
For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to hearing the recordings!
Quentin.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...> wrote:
Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom: https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost. I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will gladly pay it from my own pocket". This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts. I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be dependant on others. Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@... <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote experience. * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference. * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers. * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support. * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote. * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager
Web: www.nvaccess.org Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
|
|
Thanks Robert!
Now I don't want to scare you off, but particularly if you are still the chair next year, I've got YOU in mind to do an NVDA story on in the lead up to the conference like we did with Justin this year :)
Quentin.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks Quentin for the kind words
I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with
you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours
(like now where it is 2:00 am here).
Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show
and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance.
Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make
it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub
conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any
time again.
I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be.
Cheers
Robert
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote:
> Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved
> on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
>
> Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a
> talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from
> running the show next year!
>
> In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially
> to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers
> and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the
> expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about
> sponsorship is worthwhile.
>
> For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to
> hearing the recordings!
>
> Quentin.
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom:
>> https://zoom.us/pricing
>>
>> I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost.
>> I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will
>> gladly pay it from my own pocket".
>> This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per
>> year
>> The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live
>> streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so
>> on) amounts to $1200 per year.
>>
>> Some people said that we could use their accounts.
>> I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be
>> dependant on others.
>> Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph
>> said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Robert
>>
>> On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
>> > Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and
>> > individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion
>> > etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide
>> > starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many
>> > folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that
>> > would be a running start.
>> >
>> > On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
>> >> I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up
>> >> being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a
>> >> matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative
>> >> platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded
>> >> and/or set up.
>> >>
>> >> Jamie
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@...
>> >> <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for
>> >> 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control.
>> >> I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years
>> >> pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings
>> >> soon.
>> >>
>> >> On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>>
>> >>> First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I
>> >>> personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic
>> >>> and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran
>> >>> smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
>> >>>
>> >>> A few thank you’s:
>> >>>
>> >>> * Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading
>> >>> the pre-keynote experience.
>> >>> * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for
>> >>> streaming parts of the conference.
>> >>> * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers.
>> >>> * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support.
>> >>> * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote.
>> >>> * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
>> >>>
>> >>> And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion
>> >>> for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the
>> >>> event served as a healing moment for you.
>> >>>
>> >>> Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I
>> >>> would like to suggest that organizers look into a different
>> >>> platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think
>> >>> about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future
>> >>> conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom
>> >>> is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel
>> >>> spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to
>> >>> suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly
>> >>> using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it
>> >>> effectively.
>> >>>
>> >>> Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from
>> >>> there will be done when recordings become available.
>> >>>
>> >>> I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm
>> >>> that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next
>> >>> year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for
>> >>> presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation
>> >>> etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things
>> >>> in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the
>> >>> distance.
>> >>>
>> >>> May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to
>> >>> come.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> Joseph
>> >>>
>> >>> Joseph S. Lee
>> >>>
>> >>> Student (communication studies), California State University, Los
>> >>> Angeles
>> >>>
>> >>> Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
>> >>>
>> >>> Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
>> >>>
>> >>> Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon –
>> >>> 2014 to 2016
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Quentin Christensen
> Training and Support Manager
>
> Web: www.nvaccess.org
> Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/
> Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/
> User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
> Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager
|
|
Hi.
According to what I've seen, Zoom can be paid month-by-month, but
the web offers anual plans by default. Anual prices are usually
equal to 10 months.
Additionally, for nonprofit organizations, at least here in
spain, zoom seems to offer a 50% discount on all plans, 1 plan
request per organization per year, via Techsoup. As Techsoup is an
international company, I think similar offers would be available
in other countries.
I don't think moving from TeamTalk is a fundamental need for
conferences such as NVDACon or our local meeting, but to be honest
some people was complaining about TeamTalk also during our last
conference, held in last month; however there wasn't such a strong
debate as in NVDACon's openning forum.
Regards.
Congratulations on all your work. Regards.
Iván Novegil Cancelas
Editor
ivan.novegil@...


Comunidad hispanohablante de NVDA | Proyecto NVDA.es
- www.NVDA.es
- @nvda_es
Usuario do NVDA en galego
***Esta mensaxe e/ou os seus adxuntos están dirixidos ao seu
destinatario e poden conter información privilexiada ou
confidencial. A utilización, copia ou divulgación dos mesmos por
parte de alguén diferente do destinatario mencionado non están
permitidas sen autorización. Se recibiu esta mensaxe por erro
pregámoslle o comunique por esta mesma vía e a destrúa.***
O 08/12/2020 á(s) 2:20, Robert Hänggi
escribiu:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks Quentin for the kind words
I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with
you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours
(like now where it is 2:00 am here).
Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show
and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance.
Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make
it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub
conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any
time again.
I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be.
Cheers
Robert
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote:
Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved
on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a
talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from
running the show next year!
In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially
to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers
and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the
expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about
sponsorship is worthwhile.
For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to
hearing the recordings!
Quentin.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...>
wrote:
Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom:
https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost.
I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will
gladly pay it from my own pocket".
This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per
year
The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live
streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so
on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts.
I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be
dependant on others.
Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph
said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers
Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and
individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion
etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide
starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many
folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that
would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up
being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a
matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative
platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded
and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@...
<mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for
2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control.
I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years
pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings
soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I
personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic
and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran
smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading
the pre-keynote experience.
* Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for
streaming parts of the conference.
* Austin Pinto and other recording engineers.
* Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support.
* NV Access crew: another amazing keynote.
* Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion
for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the
event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I
would like to suggest that organizers look into a different
platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think
about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future
conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom
is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel
spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to
suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly
using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it
effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from
there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm
that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next
year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for
presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation
etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things
in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the
distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to
come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University, Los
Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon –
2014 to 2016
--
Quentin Christensen
Training and Support Manager
Web: www.nvaccess.org
Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/
Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/
User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
|
|
Dear all, it was a pleasure to work with all of you together also this year, especially Robert, Laura, Austin and Derek really great job in organizing it this year. Even though I couldn’t participate in organizational meetings and so on, I tried to follow the conversations and to help when was possible. I have the feeling that the NVDACon team gets stronger and grows in a sustainable way which makes me really lucky to see. Regarding zoom, I explored this opportunity last year and had two long conversations with the Zoom people trying to negociate a meaningful plan which is teylored for NVDACon. I ended up at about 145 USD per month, if we include full recording features, 10 moderator accounts, full webinar features and so on. My conclusion was as follows: - The best way would be to rent a Zoom pro account from an organization which already uses it regularly (cheapest way I would say)
- Zoom doesn’t offer weekend plans
- We need a backup through an NGO to get discount
- We need an account for NVDACon to begin fund raising throughout the community (i.e. a paypal account)
- We need to think about an alternative conference format, moderating a Zoom conference which takes three days long is really really not an easy job, especially if we want to avoid what happened during Opening forum this year.
Let me know your thoughts and I can start negociations with them again. I will also try to find a solution for getting a Zoom pro account to test a one day conference, maybe in February. Doug Lee and me we’re preparing an overview of the platforms out there and will try to find what the best is for NVDACon. Best regards Adriani Von: intl@NVDACon.groups.io <intl@NVDACon.groups.io> Im Auftrag von Iván Novegil via groups.io Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2020 03:18 An: intl@NVDACon.groups.io Betreff: Re: [NVDACon] NVDACon 2020 post-mortem analysis: success, moving to a different platform, Twitter feed Hi. According to what I've seen, Zoom can be paid month-by-month, but the web offers anual plans by default. Anual prices are usually equal to 10 months. Additionally, for nonprofit organizations, at least here in spain, zoom seems to offer a 50% discount on all plans, 1 plan request per organization per year, via Techsoup. As Techsoup is an international company, I think similar offers would be available in other countries. I don't think moving from TeamTalk is a fundamental need for conferences such as NVDACon or our local meeting, but to be honest some people was complaining about TeamTalk also during our last conference, held in last month; however there wasn't such a strong debate as in NVDACon's openning forum. Regards. Congratulations on all your work. Regards. Iván Novegil Cancelas Editor ivan.novegil@...

 Comunidad hispanohablante de NVDA | Proyecto NVDA.es - www.NVDA.es - @nvda_es
Usuario do NVDA en galego
***Esta mensaxe e/ou os seus adxuntos están dirixidos ao seu destinatario e poden conter información privilexiada ou confidencial. A utilización, copia ou divulgación dos mesmos por parte de alguén diferente do destinatario mencionado non están permitidas sen autorización. Se recibiu esta mensaxe por erro pregámoslle o comunique por esta mesma vía e a destrúa.*** O 08/12/2020 á(s) 2:20, Robert Hänggi escribiu:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks Quentin for the kind words I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours (like now where it is 2:00 am here). Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance. Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any time again. I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be. Cheers Robert On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote: Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job! Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from running the show next year! In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about sponsorship is worthwhile. For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to hearing the recordings! Quentin. On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...> wrote: Hi Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom: https://zoom.us/pricing I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost. I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will gladly pay it from my own pocket". This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so on) amounts to $1200 per year. Some people said that we could use their accounts. I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be dependant on others. Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities. Cheers Robert On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote: Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that would be a running start. On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote: I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up. Jamie On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@... <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote: I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings soon. On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote: Hi all, First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive. A few thank you’s: * Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote experience. * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference. * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers. * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support. * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote. * Presenters: for diversifying the topics. And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for you. Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively. Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available. I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance. May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come. Cheers, Joseph Joseph S. Lee Student (communication studies), California State University, Los Angeles Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project Certified NVDA Expert, 2019 Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager Web: www.nvaccess.org Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
|
|
On 08/12/2020, Iván Novegil via groups.io <ivan.novegil@...> wrote: Hi.
According to what I've seen, Zoom can be paid month-by-month, but the web offers anual plans by default. Anual prices are usually equal to 10 months. I could live with a monthly payment. The only problem is that you have to cancel the subscription each year after the month of the conference because they renew it by default. Robert Additionally, for nonprofit organizations, at least here in spain, zoom seems to offer a 50% discount on all plans, 1 plan request per organization per year, via Techsoup. As Techsoup is an international company, I think similar offers would be available in other countries.
I don't think moving from TeamTalk is a fundamental need for conferences such as NVDACon or our local meeting, but to be honest some people was complaining about TeamTalk also during our last conference, held in last month; however there wasn't such a strong debate as in NVDACon's openning forum.
Regards.
Congratulations on all your work. Regards.
Iván Novegil Cancelas Editor ivan.novegil@... <mailto:ivan.novegil@...> Experto certificado en NVDA <https://certification.nvaccess.org>
NVDA.es Logo Comunidad hispanohablante de NVDA | Proyecto NVDA.es - www.NVDA.es <https://nvda.es> - @nvda_es <https://twitter.com/nvda_es>
Usuario do NVDA en galego
***Esta mensaxe e/ou os seus adxuntos están dirixidos ao seu destinatario e poden conter información privilexiada ou confidencial. A utilización, copia ou divulgación dos mesmos por parte de alguén diferente do destinatario mencionado non están permitidas sen autorización. Se recibiu esta mensaxe por erro pregámoslle o comunique por esta mesma vía e a destrúa.***
O 08/12/2020 á(s) 2:20, Robert Hänggi escribiu:
Thanks Quentin for the kind words
I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours (like now where it is 2:00 am here). Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance. Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any time again. I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be. Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote:
Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from running the show next year!
In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about sponsorship is worthwhile.
For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to hearing the recordings!
Quentin.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...> wrote:
Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom: https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost. I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will gladly pay it from my own pocket". This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts. I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be dependant on others. Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@... <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote experience. * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference. * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers. * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support. * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote. * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager
Web: www.nvaccess.org Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
|
|
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote: Thanks Robert!
Now I don't want to scare you off, but particularly if you are still the chair next year, I've got YOU in mind to do an NVDA story on in the lead up to the conference like we did with Justin this year :) I'm not that jumpy, hahaha. Good idea, I could start by recording a personal Journal so that I don't forget what happened when. Cheers Robert Quentin.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:20 PM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...> wrote:
Thanks Quentin for the kind words
I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours (like now where it is 2:00 am here). Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance. Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any time again. I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be. Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote:
Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved
on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a
talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from running the show next year!
In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially
to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about
sponsorship is worthwhile.
For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to
hearing the recordings!
Quentin.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...> wrote:
Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom: https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost. I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will gladly pay it from my own pocket". This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts. I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be dependant on others. Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that
would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends
up
being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <
linomorales001@...
<mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom
for
2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and
upgrading
the pre-keynote experience. * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference. * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers. * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support. * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote. * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope
the
event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet
regularly
using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use
it
effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University,
Los
Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader
project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager
Web: www.nvaccess.org Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager
Web: www.nvaccess.org Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
|
|
On 08/12/2020, Adriani Botez <adriani.botez@...> wrote: Dear all,
it was a pleasure to work with all of you together also this year, especially Robert, Laura, Austin and Derek really great job in organizing it this year. Even though I couldn’t participate in organizational meetings and so on, I tried to follow the conversations and to help when was possible. I have the feeling that the NVDACon team gets stronger and grows in a sustainable way which makes me really lucky to see.
Regarding zoom, I explored this opportunity last year and had two long conversations with the Zoom people trying to negociate a meaningful plan which is teylored for NVDACon. I ended up at about 145 USD per month, if we include full recording features, 10 moderator accounts, full webinar features and so on. My conclusion was as follows:
* The best way would be to rent a Zoom pro account from an organization which already uses it regularly (cheapest way I would say) Exactly so although I don't like the affiliation, dependants and overall problems on coordination that it is involved. * Zoom doesn’t offer weekend plans * We need a backup through an NGO to get discount * We need an account for NVDACon to begin fund raising throughout the community (i.e. a paypal account) Although we have a donate button, I wonder if there were ever payments made through it to the NVDA project. All in all, it needs much more than a button. We need funnels, opt-ins and most important a mailing list (gimp like) to bind users permanently. This isn't just for fund raising but also to extract valid data about the regular emails that we send (were they opened, were the links clicked etc). Apart from that, it is just convenient to set up emails beforehand and reminders (e.g. for the conference start) go out automatically. * We need to think about an alternative conference format, moderating a Zoom conference which takes three days long is really really not an easy job, especially if we want to avoid what happened during Opening forum this year.
As a side-note, did someone ever attend a zoom meeting like our forums where any user can speak at any time? The meetings that I've attended were all just directed by a single host and participants had to raise their hands to speak.
Let me know your thoughts and I can start negociations with them again.
I will also try to find a solution for getting a Zoom pro account to test a one day conference, maybe in February.
Doug Lee and me we’re preparing an overview of the platforms out there and will try to find what the best is for NVDACon.
The features that go into the workbook are not a two-men decision, are they? Because that's how one could interpret this sentence. Best Robert
Best regards
Adriani
Von: intl@NVDACon.groups.io <intl@NVDACon.groups.io> Im Auftrag von Iván Novegil via groups.io Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2020 03:18 An: intl@NVDACon.groups.io Betreff: Re: [NVDACon] NVDACon 2020 post-mortem analysis: success, moving to a different platform, Twitter feed
Hi.
According to what I've seen, Zoom can be paid month-by-month, but the web offers anual plans by default. Anual prices are usually equal to 10 months.
Additionally, for nonprofit organizations, at least here in spain, zoom seems to offer a 50% discount on all plans, 1 plan request per organization per year, via Techsoup. As Techsoup is an international company, I think similar offers would be available in other countries.
I don't think moving from TeamTalk is a fundamental need for conferences such as NVDACon or our local meeting, but to be honest some people was complaining about TeamTalk also during our last conference, held in last month; however there wasn't such a strong debate as in NVDACon's openning forum.
Regards.
Congratulations on all your work. Regards.
Iván Novegil Cancelas Editor ivan.novegil@... <mailto:ivan.novegil@...> <https://certification.nvaccess.org/>
Comunidad hispanohablante de NVDA | Proyecto NVDA.es - www.NVDA.es <https://nvda.es> - @nvda_es <https://twitter.com/nvda_es>
Usuario do NVDA en galego
***Esta mensaxe e/ou os seus adxuntos están dirixidos ao seu destinatario e poden conter información privilexiada ou confidencial. A utilización, copia ou divulgación dos mesmos por parte de alguén diferente do destinatario mencionado non están permitidas sen autorización. Se recibiu esta mensaxe por erro pregámoslle o comunique por esta mesma vía e a destrúa.***
O 08/12/2020 á(s) 2:20, Robert Hänggi escribiu:
Thanks Quentin for the kind words
I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours (like now where it is 2:00 am here). Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance. Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any time again. I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be. Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <mailto:quentin@...> <quentin@...> wrote:
Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from running the show next year!
In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about sponsorship is worthwhile.
For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to hearing the recordings!
Quentin.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <mailto:aarjay.robert@...> <aarjay.robert@...> wrote:
Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom: https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost. I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will gladly pay it from my own pocket". This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts. I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be dependant on others. Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <mailto:linomorales001@...> <linomorales001@...> wrote:
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@... <mailto:linomorales001@...> <mailto:linomorales001@...> <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote experience. * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference. * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers. * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support. * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote. * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager
Web: www.nvaccess.org <http://www.nvaccess.org> Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess> <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
|
|
Hello Robert and NVDA Con team:
First, thank you for all your efforts in putting together NVDA Con. NVDA Con went about as well as it could have. I am thankful to all of your efforts.
For my part in the chaos of the opening forum, I would like to apologize. - I attempted to come on opening forum, and explain why I believed that Teamtalk is not an ideal platform. Moderation is not as powerful as it is on other platforms, users find TeamTalk fiddly with audio particularly when or if they unplug and plug in devices, etc, TeamTalk doesn't really have echo cancellation, NVDA Con is an international conference and should not be pleased with 60 participants, particularly when more than half were organizers, moderators, and NVAccess staff, and so on. I feel very strongly that TeamTalk is a very poor choice of platform for an international conference, and I have brought this up repeatedly over the years.
- Instead of being given the opportunity to speak, I was interrupted, and organizers defended TeamTalk as being a great platform.
- I was unprofessional in my attempts to illustrate, during a small part of the opening forum, why it is a bad idea to use TeamTalk as a platform at this point. I used various nicknames, and adjusted my gain level pretty high, and caused echo while others were attempting to speak, particularly for those individuals who were attempting to interrupt me from speaking. This is not good for an international forum, and I apologize for this. I did not repeat this for the remainder of the conference, and will not do so again.
Even in this thread exchange, I am seeing organizers still say that TeamTalk is a good choice for hosting a conference. Even with all that happened during opening forum, even with the keynote running into the issues that it ran into, we still see people defending TeamTalk as a platform. I was unable to enjoy the keynote live as I kept being kicked out and needed to rejoin a number of times. Each time, because of the number of users, there was a noticeable lag, and at one point, NVDA crashed. This is on a quite powerful modern machin with 16 GB of ram and a gigabit Internet connection.
If the cost of running a Zoom room for the conference is as stated in this thread, for ten moderators, and if it then allows for streaming things like the keynote to Youtube, and if it allows greater flexibility and ability of users, developers, and interested parties all around the world to join, and if it can better enable NVDA con to reach many more users, thus being more representative of the NVDA community, then that cost is a small one to pay. If NVAccess cannot get a lower rate by working with Zoom, I am happy to donate the cost for this for next year's con. Recording would be simpler, many of the audio issues would be sorted, moderators have substantially more control, and audio quality for certain events can be enhanced with minimal jitter issues, disconnects, drop-outs, and issues with the time it takes to reconnect. Presenters and participants can easily connect by phone call, mobile app, on the web, using desktop apps on Windows, Mac, and Linux, and so on. I don't really frankly understand why there is still a question of whether this is or is not a good idea.
Again, I hope the organizers will accept my apologies for contributing to the issues with the opening forum. Thank you all for your hard work into this year's con.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote:
> Thanks Robert!
>
> Now I don't want to scare you off, but particularly if you are still the
> chair next year, I've got YOU in mind to do an NVDA story on in the lead up
> to the conference like we did with Justin this year :)
I'm not that jumpy, hahaha.
Good idea, I could start by recording a personal Journal so that I
don't forget what happened when.
Cheers
Robert
>
> Quentin.
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:20 PM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Quentin for the kind words
>>
>> I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with
>> you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours
>> (like now where it is 2:00 am here).
>> Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show
>> and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance.
>> Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make
>> it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub
>> conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any
>> time again.
>> I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might
>> be.
>> Cheers
>> Robert
>>
>> On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote:
>> > Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone
>> involved
>> > on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
>> >
>> > Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and
>> got a
>> > talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from
>> > running the show next year!
>> >
>> > In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute
>> financially
>> > to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference
>> > organisers
>> > and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the
>> > expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform
>> about
>> > sponsorship is worthwhile.
>> >
>> > For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look
>> > forward
>> to
>> > hearing the recordings!
>> >
>> > Quentin.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom:
>> >> https://zoom.us/pricing
>> >>
>> >> I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total
>> >> cost.
>> >> I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will
>> >> gladly pay it from my own pocket".
>> >> This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200
>> >> per
>> >> year
>> >> The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live
>> >> streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so
>> >> on) amounts to $1200 per year.
>> >>
>> >> Some people said that we could use their accounts.
>> >> I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be
>> >> dependant on others.
>> >> Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph
>> >> said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Robert
>> >>
>> >> On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
>> >> > Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and
>> >> > individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some
>> >> > promotion
>> >> > etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide
>> >> > starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many
>> >> > folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board
>> that
>> >> > would be a running start.
>> >> >
>> >> > On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
>> >> >> I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends
>> up
>> >> >> being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative
>> >> >> platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded
>> >> >> and/or set up.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jamie
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <
>> linomorales001@...
>> >> >> <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom
>> for
>> >> >> 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more
>> >> >> control.
>> >> >> I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of
>> >> >> years
>> >> >> pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the
>> >> >> recordings
>> >> >> soon.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Hi all,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I
>> >> >>> personally consider this a successful event despite the
>> >> >>> pandemic
>> >> >>> and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it
>> >> >>> ran
>> >> >>> smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very
>> >> >>> extensive.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> A few thank you’s:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> * Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and
>> upgrading
>> >> >>> the pre-keynote experience.
>> >> >>> * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for
>> >> >>> streaming parts of the conference.
>> >> >>> * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers.
>> >> >>> * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support.
>> >> >>> * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote.
>> >> >>> * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> And most importantly, audience members who shared their
>> >> >>> passion
>> >> >>> for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope
>> the
>> >> >>> event served as a healing moment for you.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I
>> >> >>> would like to suggest that organizers look into a different
>> >> >>> platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to
>> >> >>> think
>> >> >>> about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future
>> >> >>> conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently.
>> >> >>> Zoom
>> >> >>> is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel
>> >> >>> spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to
>> >> >>> suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet
>> regularly
>> >> >>> using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use
>> it
>> >> >>> effectively.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post
>> >> >>> from
>> >> >>> there will be done when recordings become available.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to
>> >> >>> affirm
>> >> >>> that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next
>> >> >>> year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for
>> >> >>> presenters upon request – mostly to go over online
>> >> >>> presentation
>> >> >>> etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small
>> >> >>> things
>> >> >>> in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> distance.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to
>> >> >>> come.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Joseph
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Joseph S. Lee
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Student (communication studies), California State University,
>> Los
>> >> >>> Angeles
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader
>> project
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon
>> >> >>> –
>> >> >>> 2014 to 2016
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Quentin Christensen
>> > Training and Support Manager
>> >
>> > Web: www.nvaccess.org
>> > Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/
>> > Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/
>> > User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda
>> > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
>> > Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Quentin Christensen
> Training and Support Manager
>
> Web: www.nvaccess.org
> Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/
> Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/
> User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
> Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Best, Nimer Jaber The message above is intended for the recipient to whom it was addressed. If you believe that you are not the intended recipient, please notify me via reply email and destroy all copies of this correspondence. Action taken as a result of this email or its contents by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) may result in civil or criminal charges. I have checked this email and all corresponding attachments for security threats. However, security of your machine is up to you. Thanks. Registered Linux User 529141. http://counter.li.org/To find out about a free, open-source, and versatile screen reader for Windows, visit nvaccess.orgYou can follow @nimerjaber on Twitter for the latest technology news. To contact me, you can reply to this email or you may call me at (970) (393-4481) and I will do my best to respond to you promptly.
Thank you, and have a great day!
|
|
No definitely not a two-men decision. We will discuss this during next organizational meeting I would say.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Am 08.12.2020 um 07:36 schrieb Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...>:
On 08/12/2020, Adriani Botez <adriani.botez@...> wrote:
Dear all,
it was a pleasure to work with all of you together also this year, especially Robert, Laura, Austin and Derek really great job in organizing it this year. Even though I couldn’t participate in organizational meetings and so on, I tried to follow the conversations and to help when was possible. I have the feeling that the NVDACon team gets stronger and grows in a sustainable way which makes me really lucky to see.
Regarding zoom, I explored this opportunity last year and had two long conversations with the Zoom people trying to negociate a meaningful plan which is teylored for NVDACon. I ended up at about 145 USD per month, if we include full recording features, 10 moderator accounts, full webinar features and so on. My conclusion was as follows:
* The best way would be to rent a Zoom pro account from an organization which already uses it regularly (cheapest way I would say) Exactly so although I don't like the affiliation, dependants and overall problems on coordination that it is involved.
* Zoom doesn’t offer weekend plans * We need a backup through an NGO to get discount * We need an account for NVDACon to begin fund raising throughout the community (i.e. a paypal account) Although we have a donate button, I wonder if there were ever payments made through it to the NVDA project. All in all, it needs much more than a button. We need funnels, opt-ins and most important a mailing list (gimp like) to bind users permanently. This isn't just for fund raising but also to extract valid data about the regular emails that we send (were they opened, were the links clicked etc). Apart from that, it is just convenient to set up emails beforehand and reminders (e.g. for the conference start) go out automatically.
* We need to think about an alternative conference format, moderating a Zoom conference which takes three days long is really really not an easy job, especially if we want to avoid what happened during Opening forum this year.
As a side-note, did someone ever attend a zoom meeting like our forums where any user can speak at any time? The meetings that I've attended were all just directed by a single host and participants had to raise their hands to speak.
Let me know your thoughts and I can start negociations with them again.
I will also try to find a solution for getting a Zoom pro account to test a one day conference, maybe in February.
Doug Lee and me we’re preparing an overview of the platforms out there and will try to find what the best is for NVDACon.
The features that go into the workbook are not a two-men decision, are they? Because that's how one could interpret this sentence.
Best Robert
Best regards
Adriani
Von: intl@NVDACon.groups.io <intl@NVDACon.groups.io> Im Auftrag von Iván Novegil via groups.io Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2020 03:18 An: intl@NVDACon.groups.io Betreff: Re: [NVDACon] NVDACon 2020 post-mortem analysis: success, moving to a different platform, Twitter feed
Hi.
According to what I've seen, Zoom can be paid month-by-month, but the web offers anual plans by default. Anual prices are usually equal to 10 months.
Additionally, for nonprofit organizations, at least here in spain, zoom seems to offer a 50% discount on all plans, 1 plan request per organization per year, via Techsoup. As Techsoup is an international company, I think similar offers would be available in other countries.
I don't think moving from TeamTalk is a fundamental need for conferences such as NVDACon or our local meeting, but to be honest some people was complaining about TeamTalk also during our last conference, held in last month; however there wasn't such a strong debate as in NVDACon's openning forum.
Regards.
Congratulations on all your work. Regards.
Iván Novegil Cancelas Editor ivan.novegil@... <mailto:ivan.novegil@...> <https://certification.nvaccess.org/>
Comunidad hispanohablante de NVDA | Proyecto NVDA.es - www.NVDA.es <https://nvda.es> - @nvda_es <https://twitter.com/nvda_es>
Usuario do NVDA en galego
***Esta mensaxe e/ou os seus adxuntos están dirixidos ao seu destinatario e poden conter información privilexiada ou confidencial. A utilización, copia ou divulgación dos mesmos por parte de alguén diferente do destinatario mencionado non están permitidas sen autorización. Se recibiu esta mensaxe por erro pregámoslle o comunique por esta mesma vía e a destrúa.***
O 08/12/2020 á(s) 2:20, Robert Hänggi escribiu:
Thanks Quentin for the kind words
I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours (like now where it is 2:00 am here). Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance. Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any time again. I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be. Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <mailto:quentin@...> <quentin@...> wrote:
Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from running the show next year!
In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about sponsorship is worthwhile.
For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to hearing the recordings!
Quentin.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <mailto:aarjay.robert@...> <aarjay.robert@...> wrote:
Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom: https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost. I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will gladly pay it from my own pocket". This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per year The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts. I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be dependant on others. Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <mailto:linomorales001@...> <linomorales001@...> wrote:
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@... <mailto:linomorales001@...> <mailto:linomorales001@...> <mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for 2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control. I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading the pre-keynote experience. * Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for streaming parts of the conference. * Austin Pinto and other recording engineers. * Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support. * NV Access crew: another amazing keynote. * Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I would like to suggest that organizers look into a different platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University, Los Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon – 2014 to 2016
-- Quentin Christensen Training and Support Manager
Web: www.nvaccess.org <http://www.nvaccess.org> Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/ Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/ User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess> <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
|
|
Thanks to all for all help this year. Now as for moving to zoomed I think that cost would be a big part of things we could reach more people maybe but not having a plan for weekend use is not helpful this is why I think that staying with team talk would be better .
|
|
Hi, Personally, I beg to differ: as much as TeamTalk was a useful platform, it is time to move away from a corner that we have dug ourselves into. NVDACon held during a pandemic has demonstrated a need to reach out to more audiences, and personally, I think TeamTalk is no longer a suitable platform for that. Accessibility and usability are major factors, but if the community wants to broaden the appeal of NVDACon, it should use a platform that allows more audience participation. The era of “audio only” conference is coming to a close. Because the mainstream language is visual appeal, NVDACon should strive to achieve a balance between mainstream appeal and accessibility. More people will consume news about NVDA through online media, and it is time for NVDACon to respond to it more effectively, especially now that the pandemic has changed how people consume information (online presence will be more pervasive, and so will efforts to create content that appeals not only to a specific community, but also to wider audiences). Put in another way: if NVDA is a global movement, an event that serves as a gathering of this movement should strive to reach global audiences, and one way is learning from mainstream strategies. Cheers, Joseph
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
From: intl@NVDACon.groups.io <intl@NVDACon.groups.io> On Behalf Of lauracornwell Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 11:00 AM To: intl@NVDACon.groups.io Subject: Re: [NVDACon] NVDACon 2020 post-mortem analysis: success, moving to a different platform, Twitter feed Thanks to all for all help this year. Now as for moving to zoomed I think that cost would be a big part of things we could reach more people maybe but not having a plan for weekend use is not helpful this is why I think that staying with team talk would be better .
|
|
Hi Adriani.
I'm interested on reviewing the exact budget, with plans,
features and so on, if you have any. As coordinator of this year's
Spanish meeting I want to start preparing some things for 2021's
and the platform was one of the things some attendants asked for a
change.
Nimer, I don't agree with you at all. The only thing that makes
TeamTalk a less ideal platform is the difficulty of configuring
its options and, including the fact of entering server and port
details. apart from this, it offers a complete set of moderation
tools; which moderators hadn't used them during the first part of
openning forum doesn't mean that they don't exist, in fact during
sessions with speakers classroom mode was used. furthermore,
although Zoom doesn't seem to have a poor audio quality, TeamTalk
is more configurable with regard to that. For example, in 2019
Spanish Meeting we had a speaker who was explaining track panning
with Audacity through a live demo, and he had to request the
channel to be switched into a stereo codec. with TeamTalk we were
able to do that. Echo cancellation and noise reduction are not
better due to that philosophy, which is clearly established by
TeamTalk devs, of priorizing audio quality. Another deficient
thing of TeamTalk is the support by email, but that affects server
admins only and is not the main debate here.
I find your complain legitimate, and I understand that TeamTalk
is not easy to configure for a lot of users, but saying that its
features are poor is not a good point IMO.
BTW, I think my partner Jose has sent this to robert as well, but
if you are interested, we have created a set of "run and connect"
TeamTalk clients.
https://github.com/nvda-es/arrancayconecta
Regards.
Iván Novegil Cancelas
Editor
ivan.novegil@...


Comunidad hispanohablante de NVDA | Proyecto NVDA.es
- www.NVDA.es
- @nvda_es
Usuario do NVDA en galego
***Esta mensaxe e/ou os seus adxuntos están dirixidos ao seu
destinatario e poden conter información privilexiada ou
confidencial. A utilización, copia ou divulgación dos mesmos por
parte de alguén diferente do destinatario mencionado non están
permitidas sen autorización. Se recibiu esta mensaxe por erro
pregámoslle o comunique por esta mesma vía e a destrúa.***
O 08/12/2020 á(s) 5:43, Adriani Botez
escribiu:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Dear all,
it was a pleasure to
work with all of you together also this year, especially
Robert, Laura, Austin and Derek really great job in
organizing it this year. Even though I couldn’t participate
in organizational meetings and so on, I tried to follow the
conversations and to help when was possible. I have the
feeling that the NVDACon team gets stronger and grows in a
sustainable way which makes me really lucky to see.
Regarding zoom, I
explored this opportunity last year and had two long
conversations with the Zoom people trying to negociate a
meaningful plan which is teylored for NVDACon. I ended up at
about 145 USD per month, if we include full recording
features, 10 moderator accounts, full webinar features and
so on. My conclusion was as follows:
- The best way would be to rent a Zoom pro
account from an organization which already uses it
regularly (cheapest way I would say)
- Zoom doesn’t offer weekend plans
- We need a backup through an NGO to get
discount
- We need an account for NVDACon to begin fund
raising throughout the community (i.e. a paypal account)
- We need to think about an alternative
conference format, moderating a Zoom conference which
takes three days long is really really not an easy job,
especially if we want to avoid what happened during
Opening forum this year.
Let me know your thoughts and I can start
negociations with them again.
I will also try to find a solution for getting
a Zoom pro account to test a one day conference, maybe in
February.
Doug Lee and me we’re preparing an overview of
the platforms out there and will try to find what the best
is for NVDACon.
Best regards
Adriani
Hi.
According to what I've seen, Zoom can be paid month-by-month,
but the web offers anual plans by default. Anual prices are
usually equal to 10 months.
Additionally, for nonprofit organizations, at least here in
spain, zoom seems to offer a 50% discount on all plans, 1 plan
request per organization per year, via Techsoup. As Techsoup
is an international company, I think similar offers would be
available in other countries.
I don't think moving from TeamTalk is a fundamental need for
conferences such as NVDACon or our local meeting, but to be
honest some people was complaining about TeamTalk also during
our last conference, held in last month; however there wasn't
such a strong debate as in NVDACon's openning forum.
Regards.
Congratulations on all your work. Regards.
Iván Novegil Cancelas
Editor
ivan.novegil@...


Comunidad hispanohablante de NVDA | Proyecto NVDA.es
- www.NVDA.es
- @nvda_es
Usuario do NVDA en galego
***Esta mensaxe e/ou os seus adxuntos están dirixidos ao seu
destinatario e poden conter información privilexiada ou
confidencial. A utilización, copia ou divulgación dos mesmos
por parte de alguén diferente do destinatario mencionado non
están permitidas sen autorización. Se recibiu esta mensaxe
por erro pregámoslle o comunique por esta mesma vía e a
destrúa.***
O 08/12/2020 á(s) 2:20, Robert Hänggi
escribiu:
Thanks Quentin for the kind words
I must say it was such a pleasure and so inspirational to work with
you one to one that I didn't mind staying up wide into the small hours
(like now where it is 2:00 am here).
Especially in the first weeks when I felt like doing a one-man show
and reaching out to you was soothing to my mental balance.
Our "conspiracy" produced some great ideas of which not all could make
it into the conference as yet but they are burnt into our sub
conscience (or just the email archive) so that they could pop up any
time again.
I'm looking forward to work with you again in whichever role that might be.
Cheers
Robert
On 08/12/2020, Quentin Christensen <quentin@...> wrote:
Congratulations Joseph, Robert, Derek, Austin, Laura and everyone involved
on running a very successful and well received NVDACon, great job!
Joseph, you will be missed, but you have setup a great foundation and got a
talented group of people holding the fort so enjoy your time away from
running the show next year!
In terms of cost, NV Access are certainly willing to contribute financially
to whatever solution is going to work best for the conference organisers
and participants - although of course we need to be able to justify the
expense as well, and it may be that approaching a particular platform about
sponsorship is worthwhile.
For now, congratulations again on a great conference, and I look forward to
hearing the recordings!
Quentin.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:48 AM Robert Hänggi <aarjay.robert@...>
wrote:
Hi
Again, for reference, here is the pricing page of zoom:
https://zoom.us/pricing
I'm horrified when I check the feature we want and read the total cost.
I've read comments like "If they can't afford $10 per month, I will
gladly pay it from my own pocket".
This is very misleading. The minimum plan for our purpose costs $200 per
year
The ideal plan (with phone calling, enough participants, live
streaming, multiple rooms, replays, better website integration and so
on) amounts to $1200 per year.
Some people said that we could use their accounts.
I don't know how you feel about it but I don't like the thought to be
dependant on others.
Nonetheless, we will check out the options and Doug lee (as Joseph
said) is composing a workbook with all the possibilities.
Cheers
Robert
On 08/12/2020, Lino Morales <linomorales001@...> wrote:
Yes you are correct James. I wonder between NV Access and
individuals/non for proffit orgs around the world with some promotion
etc. could raise money to use Zoom? If the NVDA community worldwide
starts something like this now that would be great. Yeah I know many
folks can't donate, but if we get said orgs for the blind on board that
would be a running start.
On 12/7/2020 6:27 PM, James Teh wrote:
I'd respectfully point out that Zoom is not free - it actually ends up
being quite costly for something like NVDACon - so it's not simply a
matter of popular opinion. Any proposal to move to an alternative
platform also needs to consider how that platform will be funded
and/or set up.
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lino Morales <linomorales001@...
<mailto:linomorales001@...>> wrote:
I didn't partake in the Con this year, however I vote for Zoom for
2021 and later. As you stated Joseph the hosts have more control.
I'm been crowing about getting Zoom for the past couple of years
pree pandemic. Glad it went well and hope to hear the recordings
soon.
On 12/7/2020 4:39 PM, Joseph Lee wrote:
Hi all,
First, it was great to see many people at NVDACon 2020. I
personally consider this a successful event despite the pandemic
and its effects. Although we had issues in the beginning, it ran
smoothly, especially as the post-keynote QnA was very extensive.
A few thank you’s:
* Robert Hangi: chairing the organizing committee and upgrading
the pre-keynote experience.
* Laura Cornwell and friends: effective promotion, and for
streaming parts of the conference.
* Austin Pinto and other recording engineers.
* Derek Riemer: infrastructure and providing support.
* NV Access crew: another amazing keynote.
* Presenters: for diversifying the topics.
And most importantly, audience members who shared their passion
for NVDA and giving organizers countless encouragements. Hope the
event served as a healing moment for you.
Second, based on actual experience and post-event feedback, I
would like to suggest that organizers look into a different
platform for NVDACon 2021 and beyond. Of course we have to think
about accessibility and outreach, but mostly to help future
conference moderators perform their tasks more efficiently. Zoom
is a possibility, and Doug Lee apparently organized an Excel
spreadsheet with potential platforms. I would also like to
suggest that when a platform is chosen, organizers meet regularly
using that platform to familiarize themselves as to how to use it
effectively.
Lastly, NVDACon Twitter feed is still alive. The next post from
there will be done when recordings become available.
I announced this after the closing forum, but this is to affirm
that I will not be participating in NVDACon planning for next
year. However, if people want me to, I can give coaching for
presenters upon request – mostly to go over online presentation
etiquette, how to respond to comments, and refining small things
in content. Apart from that, I will be your biggest fan from the
distance.
May the NVDACon continue to bridge the community for years to
come.
Cheers,
Joseph
Joseph S. Lee
Student (communication studies), California State University, Los
Angeles
Code contributor and add-ons reviewer, NVDA screen reader project
Certified NVDA Expert, 2019
Founding chair, NVDA Users and Developers Conference (NVDACon –
2014 to 2016
--
Quentin Christensen
Training and Support Manager
Web: www.nvaccess.org
Training: https://www.nvaccess.org/shop/
Certification: https://certification.nvaccess.org/
User group: https://nvda.groups.io/g/nvda
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NVAccess
Twitter: @NVAccess <https://twitter.com/NVAccess>
|
|
Well joseph the only real alternitive is zoom.
Zoom will work but someone has to pay if you want to run with
more than 3 people for 40 minutes.
So someone will have to pay to run zoom.
Teamtalk is fine for audio and its free.
Now I guess if we could get funding to hire a zoom room for the
conference that would be different.
But someone would need to pay for and subscribe to zoom.
I could see nvaccess doing this, the problem,the only time a
meeting is handled is for the conference.
The only other way would to join another group's zoom account,
but that would mean someone else hosting it.
Looking on zoom, while I have not looked at the rooms prices, a
meeting starts at 200 us and up and a webinar starts at 400 bucks
a year for 100 people and up to 1000 for 500 people.
No one knows how many will attend a conference.
Teamtalk aparently can do video but yeah, who knows.
Unless there is a drive to donait for a subscription to zoom,
then I don't know.
Bottem line, how many blind people will care to donate cash for a
yearly event 1 time.
Sure if I had the 1000 bucks for 500 people, I'd pay that per
year, but I don't have that.
There are other options for developers and educators and not sure
about the rest, I guess zoom could be approached by those handling
conferences and asked for the event its only really 1 or so
weekends sometimes a couple weeks a year.
On 9/12/2020 8:13 am, Joseph Lee wrote:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Hi,
Personally, I beg to differ: as much
as TeamTalk was a useful platform, it is time to move away
from a corner that we have dug ourselves into. NVDACon held
during a pandemic has demonstrated a need to reach out to
more audiences, and personally, I think TeamTalk is no
longer a suitable platform for that. Accessibility and
usability are major factors, but if the community wants to
broaden the appeal of NVDACon, it should use a platform that
allows more audience participation.
The era of “audio only” conference is
coming to a close. Because the mainstream language is visual
appeal, NVDACon should strive to achieve a balance between
mainstream appeal and accessibility. More people will
consume news about NVDA through online media, and it is time
for NVDACon to respond to it more effectively, especially
now that the pandemic has changed how people consume
information (online presence will be more pervasive, and so
will efforts to create content that appeals not only to a
specific community, but also to wider audiences). Put in
another way: if NVDA is a global movement, an event that
serves as a gathering of this movement should strive to
reach global audiences, and one way is learning from
mainstream strategies.
Cheers,
Joseph
Thanks to all for all help this year. Now
as for moving to zoomed I think that cost would be a big
part of things we could reach more people maybe but not
having a plan for weekend use is not helpful this is why I
think that staying with team talk would be better .
|
|