Re: NVDACon 2020 post-mortem analysis: success, moving to a different platform, Twitter feed
Iván Novegil
Hi Adriani.
I'm interested on reviewing the exact budget, with plans, features and so on, if you have any. As coordinator of this year's Spanish meeting I want to start preparing some things for 2021's and the platform was one of the things some attendants asked for a change. Nimer, I don't agree with you at all. The only thing that makes TeamTalk a less ideal platform is the difficulty of configuring its options and, including the fact of entering server and port details. apart from this, it offers a complete set of moderation tools; which moderators hadn't used them during the first part of openning forum doesn't mean that they don't exist, in fact during sessions with speakers classroom mode was used. furthermore, although Zoom doesn't seem to have a poor audio quality, TeamTalk is more configurable with regard to that. For example, in 2019 Spanish Meeting we had a speaker who was explaining track panning with Audacity through a live demo, and he had to request the channel to be switched into a stereo codec. with TeamTalk we were able to do that. Echo cancellation and noise reduction are not better due to that philosophy, which is clearly established by TeamTalk devs, of priorizing audio quality. Another deficient thing of TeamTalk is the support by email, but that affects server admins only and is not the main debate here. I find your complain legitimate, and I understand that TeamTalk is not easy to configure for a lot of users, but saying that its features are poor is not a good point IMO. BTW, I think my partner Jose has sent this to robert as well, but if you are interested, we have created a set of "run and connect" TeamTalk clients. https://github.com/nvda-es/arrancayconecta
Regards. Iván Novegil Cancelas O 08/12/2020 á(s) 5:43, Adriani Botez
escribiu:
|
|